I wanted to talk with you about the bust of Pallas. You and your Ravenian protagonist were men of books. He had, once upon a midnight dreary, while he pondered, weak and weary over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore, vainly sought to borrow from his books surcease of sorrow -- sorrow for the lost Lenore w

But, sore as we all may be for our friend's sorrow, I just want to talk about the bust, the one of Pallas above the chamber door. I am trying to track down a factoid about busts and books. Now you, Poe, said, in the voice of our sad friend,
Open here I flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
In there stepped a stately Raven of the saintly days of yore;
Not the least obeisance made he; not a minute stopped or stayed he;
But, with mien of lord or lady, perched above my chamber door
--Perched upon a bust of Pallas just above my chamber door--
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.
Then this ebony bird beguiling my sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
"Though thy crest be shorn and shaven, thou," I said, "art sure no
craven,
Ghastly grim and ancient Raven wandering from the Nightly shore--
Tell me what thy lordly name is on the Night's Plutonian shore!"
Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore.
Now the fact of the matter is that I am not studying your work right now, but it was

I have tried, formerly, to wade my way through the Haethains, Hrethels, and Herebealds of Old English, and only concluded that the language was a Grendl whose lair was one I could not enter. It felt too much like hand to hand combat. So I have been surprised that now I am a fan, not of Beowulf as Nordic Superhero, but of Beowulf as Aged Contemplative.
Perhaps the only thing I knew of the Beowulf story was:
- It was one of the first pieces of true English literature.
- Beowulf fights and kills the monster Grendl (which, some say, is the template for the orcs of Tolkieniana)
- Grendl had a lair.

I'm meaning to write a letter to J.R.R. about these things, but first I wanted to find out something from you about library cataloguing. Were you thinking of a room, in the Raven, as one with busts on top of every shelf? Did the gentleman in your poem enter the room and say, "I believe I'll read Sir Galwain, that would be 'Nero A.x.' Go to the bust of Nero, top shelf (denoted by A) and then the tenth book? According to a little book I'm reading about Beowulf, Robert Cotton, who preserved the original Beowulf manuscript organized his bookshelves that way and I thought that perhaps you did too, at least in your imaginings.
How beautiful it would be to enter a classic library and find one's books in such an artful way. Supposedly the great Beowulf manuscript is still kept in the British Library under the bust of Vitellius. My guess is that the public doesn't have free access. Ah to wander a library, unfettered, and see these amazing things. Wouldn't that be terrific? We do have great digital access, and I should be satisfied with that I suppose, but I would love to see the analog version. But, to quote the raven, "Nevermore."
BRD
8 comments:
Interesting thoughts on all of this. :)
I personally really enjoyed Beowulf. It was a high school read, so the details are fuzzy. But I liked its epic scale.
I also read a book called Grendel, which is the same story from the perspective of the beast. He was sort of an adolescent male whose mother treated him like a child even after he was old enough to have grown into a man...or at least a full grown monster. Well the story went on like that. It was interesting, but nothing like Beowulf.
Did you ever see the movie the 13th Warrior? It was sort of a Beowulf wannabe. But a great movie!
JRR's books, Monsters and Their Critics has a bit of a defense of the importance of monsters. He compares the Greek and Nordic epic or myth and notes the difference that in the Greek tale, the gods create the monsters and kind of sic them on humans, where in the Northern stories, the monsters are of a more human origin and the other humans join with God or the gods to defeat the monsters. This is, I think a difference of great importance.
More intriguing is the need of humans for monsters, no?
Obviously, we need monsters in some way or other. Is it that we need them for entertainment or is it that we need a safe way to express our perception of the things that scare us in life, things that are psychologically too big to put a handle or hand on. Perhaps Perotsky would have some thoughts on that.
I will take it up with Perotsky, but I think the monsters are us. Our shadows. An enemy to fight in the name of self-preservation. Eros and Thanatos in the duel.
This is a wonderful little letter, a wonderful little reflection on Beowulf - and such strange connections you make between the famous works of English literature. Thanks for sharing it.
You haven't letter-ed in a while - hope it means your busy with sooo many fun things that you don't have time (like the beach, which I know took up some of your time!).
Thanks for your comment Anne GG. The strangest thing is that the connections really are there.
Thanks for your comment Anne GG. The strangest thing is that the connections really are there.
Post a Comment